AGGREGATE vs. ROI
When you start looking at the different ways in which trading
results are analysed, you’ll notice that they fall into two broad
categories, Aggregate Analysis and Return on Investment analysis. We
use the latter for reasons that, hopefully, we’ll make clear
throughout this Paper. Unfortunately many in the industry don’t.
They use versions of Aggregate Analysis which, as we’ll show you, is
a slippery slope into results that are at best misleading, at worst,
deceptive.
So what is Aggregate Analysis?
Let’s say, for example, that a service did one trade in the month.
They make 12% on that trade. According to Aggregate Analysis, they
would then claim that they had made 12% for the month. But did they?
In another instance (and these are all real examples) a service does
4 trades for the month, averaging 8.5%. They claim, according to
Aggregate Analysis, that they made 8.5% for the month. Really?
And probably the most common example is when they’re calculating
yearly returns. Say they did 28 trades for the year and the sum of
all those trades (that is, the return for each trade added together)
was 112%. Their claim, according to Aggregate Analysis, was that
they made 112% return for the year.
So all Aggregate Analysis does (and this is where its name comes
from) is add the results of the individual trades together. And you
can understand why a service would do that – it’s not only simple
but, most importantly, it shows off their performance in the best
possible light. Hey, if you could do one trade and make 12% a month,
why wouldn’t you subscribe?
Because you haven’t actually made 12%, that’s why. Not in the way
that most people would think about trading or investment returns.
We’ll go more into the details of this later in the White Paper but,
just so you understand the difference between Aggregate Analysis and
Return on Investment analysis, let me show you why you didn’t make
12% for the month.
Let’s assume you have a bank of $10,000 and you’re risking 5% per
trade because you’re trading options and options are risky. So
that’s $500 maximum per trade. You bought a put contract for $1.00,
so with 5 of those you’ve reached your maximum spend. The trade
makes 12% which is $60, so you’re out for $560.
What return did you make for the month?
$60 / $10,000 = 0.6%
No, you did not make $1,200, as the 12% return suggested you would.
You only made 0.6% because, normally, returns are calculated based
on the total investment. And your total investment wasn’t just the
$500 you put at stake for that particular trade, it was the entire
$10,000 you have in your trading account, because while it’s sitting
there in your trading account it isn’t doing anything else. You
can’t have it invested elsewhere earning money for you – it has to
be in your trading account so you can practice proper money
management and risk allocation.
So why doesn’t the service tell you that you only made 0.6% for the
month?